This is a "status quo" budget. There is no big bang reform  propelling India to the next stage of growth. However, getting down the  fiscal deficit while predicting a 9 percent GDP growth is creditable.   The success of the budget will count on how the ministry is able to  implement and execute on their proposal. In the absence of a clear path  to reforms, we perhaps have to depend on Pranab Mukherjee’s past history  to steer the Indian economy successfully this fiscal year. From a  general insurance perspective there is very little the budget offers.   For this sector, we were expecting more reforms for financial  inclusion, woman empowerment and senior citizen benefits.
  Overall 
  - What we have to watch out for is Pranab Mukherjee's commitment to  reducing the fiscal deficit. Unless there are clear indicators on how  subsidies are going to be stabilized and controlled, the 4.6% commitment  seems ambitious.  
 - While for the banking sector there is greater thrust on capital  infusion for ensuring capital adequacy, we expected a similar proposal  for the increase of FDI to 49%. Currently for us it’s a wait and watch  on what further defines liberalization of the policy
 - There is some progress made in the infrastructure sector, education  sector and housing, with the increase in the exemption limit by 5 lakhs  with 1% concession.  
 - The personal tax exemption for senior citizens and the introduction  of the new special senior citizen category with even higher tax  exemption is a positive. However, this remains restrictive. Some of the  core issues relating to funding for retirement as well as ways to  address problems caused by rising health care costs especially for the  elderly has not been addressed.
 - Its high time there is a move in encouraging the growth of  alternative vehicles. The National Mission for hybrid and electric  vehicles is the first step. But the success of this will depend on the  action plan that will be laid out for inducing growth of India as a  manufacturing hub
  From a general insurance industry perspective - Rural propositions are more focused on the agricultural sector.  Micro insurance products should ideally have been exempted from service  tax. This would have triggered penetration of the insurance sector into  the rural markets.
 - With the rising medical inflation its disappointing that the 80 D  benefits remain unchanged and neither are there any significant attempts  made to increase health care infrastructure. This will lead to  increased healthcare costs and consequently to rise in health insurance  premiums.
  
    |    | 
No comments:
Post a Comment